20.2 Russell’s paradox

Suppose that we have a set RR such that

R={A:A∉A}R=\{A:A\notin A\} (20.18)

That is, \sayRR is the set of objects which are not elements of themselves.

However, is R∈RR\in R? Well, if RR is in RR, then RR (by definition of RR) is not in RR. If RR is not in RR, then RR (by definition of RR) is in RR. This is a paradox - it cannot be true.

The solution to this paradox is to be very careful when defining sets - we cannot define sets based on arbitrary criteria; we must build them out of other, well-defined and pre-existing sets!